<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Estate Market Mixed Messages - Higher Fannie &#038; Freddie Fees Penalize Home Buyers</title>
	<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/</link>
	<description>Central Connecticut Real estate news, advice and opinion combined with pet friendly resources and help for homeless pets by REMAX agent Jessica Beganski.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monte Trigillo</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>Monte Trigillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>A brill post please keep it up thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brill post please keep it up thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment.  I'm going to both agree and disagree with you.  

While many buyers maybe getting their closing costs paid for, it's not as if that money magically appears. The sellers may be giving it to the buyers but more often than not, it's done as a gross up, where the seller give the buyers the cash but the buyer actually takes a larger mortgage. So either home sellers or home buyers pay - not the people who took out cash out refis to pay for a facelift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment.  I&#8217;m going to both agree and disagree with you.  </p>
<p>While many buyers maybe getting their closing costs paid for, it&#8217;s not as if that money magically appears. The sellers may be giving it to the buyers but more often than not, it&#8217;s done as a gross up, where the seller give the buyers the cash but the buyer actually takes a larger mortgage. So either home sellers or home buyers pay - not the people who took out cash out refis to pay for a facelift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InvestinNewHaven</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>InvestinNewHaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>Jessica, Jessica...

I love to be contrary so here we go.  The reality is that many of the buyers making purchases in 2009 will not have to pay their closing costs due to seller paid concessions.  Those that do probably don't have strong buyer representation.  

And while I agree that it is generaly depressing to see that those who made the right decision are now going to pay for the mistakes of others, isn't this always the way?  (I know the cynic in you is saying yes right now.)  

So we have to grin and bear it, but likely only for a short while.  I see this as an attempt to regain investor trust.  We all need the investor's to feel comfortable making loans in the current market, so if this is how FNMAE FRMAC are going to entice the investors back into the business of making loans, so be it.  Once things stabilize (towards the end of the third quarter) then we may see these penalties go away. (Can you tell I'm an optimist?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessica, Jessica&#8230;</p>
<p>I love to be contrary so here we go.  The reality is that many of the buyers making purchases in 2009 will not have to pay their closing costs due to seller paid concessions.  Those that do probably don&#8217;t have strong buyer representation.  </p>
<p>And while I agree that it is generaly depressing to see that those who made the right decision are now going to pay for the mistakes of others, isn&#8217;t this always the way?  (I know the cynic in you is saying yes right now.)  </p>
<p>So we have to grin and bear it, but likely only for a short while.  I see this as an attempt to regain investor trust.  We all need the investor&#8217;s to feel comfortable making loans in the current market, so if this is how FNMAE FRMAC are going to entice the investors back into the business of making loans, so be it.  Once things stabilize (towards the end of the third quarter) then we may see these penalties go away. (Can you tell I&#8217;m an optimist?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bergen County Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bergen County Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>Aside from the cash out refinance, I agree, that the government should be helping buyers with money to buy. I think too much is being served up to people who have no hope and not to people who can help themselves a bit. I think this will change. They will find people won't take their deal. I also feel the  administration will wakes up to how markets and people think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the cash out refinance, I agree, that the government should be helping buyers with money to buy. I think too much is being served up to people who have no hope and not to people who can help themselves a bit. I think this will change. They will find people won&#8217;t take their deal. I also feel the  administration will wakes up to how markets and people think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>Buyers come out on top if interest rates stay low and prices are allowed to come down.  If there is artificial propping up of the market, then the recovery will just take longer.  But that's just my cynical view...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buyers come out on top if interest rates stay low and prices are allowed to come down.  If there is artificial propping up of the market, then the recovery will just take longer.  But that&#8217;s just my cynical view&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami Beach condos</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami Beach condos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>Interesting perspective on the recovery plan. But, I think the buyers still come out with the better end of the deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting perspective on the recovery plan. But, I think the buyers still come out with the better end of the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>It's an additional fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an additional fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ctrealestateunleashed.com/2009/02/20/real-estate-market-mixed-messages-higher-fannie-freddie-fees-penalize-home-buyers/#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>Is this in place of the 1% private mortgage insurance coverage if you put less than 20% down? Or in addition to? I guess of government is banking of very low interest rates to stick around for a while- but the initial judgment from first-time home buyers going to be sticker shock when they see what their monthly payment is going to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this in place of the 1% private mortgage insurance coverage if you put less than 20% down? Or in addition to? I guess of government is banking of very low interest rates to stick around for a while- but the initial judgment from first-time home buyers going to be sticker shock when they see what their monthly payment is going to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
